How to Stop the Pain of Wishing People Were Different

How to Stop the Pain of Wishing People Were Different

By RICK HANSON | Greater Good Magazine

Sometimes it’s hard to just accept people for who they are. Here’s how to be at peace with someone, faults and all.


I admit it: I wish some people were different. Depending on who they are, I wish they’d stop doing things like leaving cabinet doors open in our kitchen, sending me spam emails, or turning a blind eye to global warming. And I wish they’d start doing things like being friendlier and more helpful. Even if it doesn’t affect me directly, for their own sake I do wish that some people I care about were more energetic, less anxious, or less self-critical.

In what ways do you wish that people were different? Think about the people close to you as well as coworkers, neighbors, and drivers on the highway. It’s normal to wish that others were different, just as it’s normal to wish that you, yourself, were different (say, richer or wiser).

It’s fine to try to influence others in skillful, ethical ways. But problems come when we tip into fault-finding, badgering, contempt, or any other kind of struggle.

Instead, we could accept them for who they are, and for who they are not. Acceptance means you “give up” to the truth—the facts, reality—no matter what it is. You may not like it, for understandable reasons. For example, I don’t like the facts that many children go hungry each day, that my mother and father are no longer here, and that I’ve hurt people by losing my temper. But things are what they are, and we can accept them while still trying to make them better, when that’s possible. Acceptance grounds us in what is true, which is where we have to start for any lasting effectiveness, happiness, or healing.

Accepting people does not itself mean agreeing with them, liking them, or downplaying their impact on you. You can still take appropriate actions. You’re simply accepting the reality of the other person. You may not like it, you may not prefer it, you may feel sad or angry about it, but, at a deeper level, you are at peace with it. That alone is a blessing. And, sometimes, your shift to acceptance can open a kind of space in which a relationship can improve.

How

To have a clear experience of acceptance, start with a simple, direct, undeniable experience, such as accepting the sensations of breathing. For a few breaths, focus on the sense of letting the breath be whatever it is. Try saying softly in your mind things like these: I accept this rising of the chest . . . I accept this falling . . . this flowing in and flowing out. I accept that there is breathing now . . . I accept the fact of breathing now . . . Try taking it a little further: I accept the fact that this body needs air . . . I accept that I need to breathe.

What does acceptance feel like? What is enjoyable or meaningful about it?

Accepting what’s hard to accept
. Now try something that is hard to accept, starting with a small to medium issue. Some examples might be: I can’t believe that some people don’t use their turning signals while driving . . . I don’t like how my roommate does the dishes . . . I wish my partner were less hyper-rational and more in touch with their feelings.

Then, just as you did for breathing, try to hold this fact in a context of acceptance. Fill in the blank with the fact, and say things to yourself like these: It’s true that _______ . . . I see that _______ . . . I surrender to the fact that _______ . . . I wish with all my heart that _______ weren’t the case, but it is . . . I give up about _______ . . . I accept _______. See if you can soften around the truth of things, if you can open out to the way things are.

Understanding blocks to acceptance. 
As you try to be more accepting of others, you might bump into two common blocks.

The first block is avoiding the disappointment or even despair you could feel if you really got that someone was just that certain way, and likely to stay that way. Remind yourself that you can tolerate these painful feelings as they pass through awareness while finding a deeper acceptance of the reality of the other person.

<a href=“https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/707002/making-great-relationships-by-rick-hanson-phd/”><em>Making Great Relationships: Simple Practices for Solving Conflicts, Building Connection, and Fostering Love</em></a> (Harmony, 2023, 304 pages)Making Great Relationships: Simple Practices for Solving Conflicts, Building Connection, and Fostering Love (Harmony, 2023, 304 pages)

The second block is pushing to make something happen that just won’t. For example, while it may be sad to face it, it might simply be true that someone will never admit what they did or give you the love you long for. Our strengths, not just our weaknesses, can get us in trouble, such as being so determined that you keep searching too long inside tunnels that truly have no cheese. After you’ve let yourself feel understandable frustration and regret, imagine putting your energy where there is more support and possibility.

Fully accepting someone. 
Pick a person who is important to you. (You can do this practice with multiple people.) In your mind, out loud, or in writing, say things like these and see how you feel: I accept you completely . . . Countless causes, large and small, have led you to think, speak, and act the way you do . . . You are who you are . . . I let it be . . . You are a fact and I accept the facts in my life . . . You and I are part of a larger whole that is what it is, and I accept that, too.

If you like, be more specific, naming aspects of this person that particularly bother you, such as: I accept that you snore . . . are always late . . . leave your clothes on the floor . . . are still angry at me . . . have little natural interest in sex . . . are fighting me tooth-and-nail in this divorce . . . don’t really understand me.

Consider how you may have gotten tangled up with this other person, struggling to change them. When I reflect on this myself, I become aware of my own pushiness, irritability, and hurts. See if you can let go of some, even all, of your own entanglements. Open to the easing and peace that can come when you do.

Consider how much you like it when you feel that another person accepts you completely. It’s a beautiful gift—and we can give it ourselves to others when we accept them. Imagine how it might improve your relationship with someone if that person felt you accepted them fully. Acceptance is a gift that gives back.

It’s easy to accept beautiful sunsets, golden prizes, and warm smiles. It’s the hard things that are hard to accept. So, it’s important to appreciate the peace that comes from giving up the fight with the way it is.

You can still do whatever you can—which might be nothing, unfortunately—while facing what is actually true. This often eases conflicts with others. And at some point, an easing can come into your heart, a softening and a clarity. With a hard-won, honest freedom.

Excerpted from Making Great Relationships by Rick Hanson. Copyright © 2023 by Rick Hanson. Used by permission of Harmony Books, an imprint of Random House, a division of Penguin Random House LLC, New York. All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.


Science and Spirituality

Science and Spirituality

By JOHN BICKART | Ph.D.

Using Science Education for Transformation / “Can Humankind Re-Integrate Our Spirituality”

Is it possible that humankind used to have a more spiritual relationship with each other and the world? What is a spiritual relationship? It is one that is more about giving than receiving – where you truly care about someone or something – one that transforms into genuine friendship with the world around you, with nature. The way we interact with nature offers possibilities of positive transformations and enhancements of ourselves as well as nature itself. As Emerson said when speaking of Nature…

The reason why the world lacks unity, and lies broken and in heaps, is, because man is disunited with himself. He cannot be a naturalist, until he satisfies all the demands of the spirit. Love is as much its demand, as perception. Indeed, neither can be perfect without the other. In the uttermost meaning of the words, thought is devout, and devotion is thought. Deep calls unto deep. But in actual life, the marriage is not celebrated.  (Emerson, Atkinson, & Ebrary, 1992)

Consider the past, the present, and the future. Is it possible we could use wisdom from the past and integrate it with our current science to transform our future version of humankind to become united within our own selves and therefore love the world around us?

Come with me to see my dream of the past, present, and future.

…………………..

A Modern Visits an Ancient

You are the modern person. You are going to visit ancient times. Get ready. They do not have technology. You are visiting a woman, and for fun, let’s pretend that you and she can speak the same language. You catch up with her as she’s in the middle of tasting some fruit. It tastes so good to her that she is ecstatic. She is not ecstatic because the fruit is better than the fruit you have, in fact it’s a pear – the same kind you eat. It’s just that her sense of taste is much better than we moderns have, today. In fact, all of her senses are better. She can enjoy color and sunlight and feel warmth and cool water better than we can, because she has the ability to pay attention better. Right now, she is on her way to bathe and sit by a waterfall with her friend. You follow them, and as they arrive at the water, you start a conversation.

You: Is the waterfall fun?

She: Yes.

You: Would you like to record this fun and show it to social acquaintances?

She: What does that mean?

You: It is a way to share what you are doing with your friends and family.

She: Why?

You: So that they can see the fun you are having.

She: But then, while I do that, I will not be having the fun in the waterfall.

You: Oh, I see what you mean. Then would you like to write down what is happening for yourself?

She: No, I just want to be with the water and the rock and the air and the Sun.

You try another tact: Is there anything about this fun you are having that you would like to remember?

She: No.

You: Don’t you want to try to capture a memory or a moment? Wouldn’t you like to try to make your day go better?

She: I cannot imagine anything better. I am not trying to do anything. I like where I am, who I am, my friends, my family, and my time. Though I sit here, I am always connected to my people and to all of nature. I need no capturing of anything; I am already connected to everything.

You: But what about later; won’t you want to remember this time?

She: I do not watch time. And I do not need to remember. When you say ‘re-member’, do you mean to put back a part – or a member – of something that used to be whole? I am whole. My life is whole. I know what I need to know when I need to know it. The member parts of my life are all together. So, I do not need to write things down, record things, or capture things.

You begin speaking more to yourself, than to her: I’m beginning to see. Perhaps it is I who have a great deal of unlearning to do.

…………………..

PERHAPS SOME THINGS ACTUALLY WERE BETTER IN OLDEN TIMES

…………………..

An Ancient Visits a Modern

Somehow – I don’t know how – an ancient man has appeared in our modern world. He has started to observe the way we work and play. Luckily, he can speak our language. He has begun to understand our way of life, but he has a lot of questions. Let’s listen in on a conversation between this ancient man and a modern man.

Ancient: I have noticed that you do not speak of everything in terms of how ‘wonderful’ or ‘beautiful’ they are. You also do not seem to attribute anything to being made by beings from the spiritual world.

Modern: No, you’re right. In our time, we have realized that we can think on our own and take care of ourselves. Many of us have outgrown superstitions about deities.

Ancient: Then, who do you think provides your ideas – your inspiration?

Modern: We do.

Ancient: And who provides the life energy in your body?

Modern: That comes from whatever we eat.

Ancient: And who provides wisdom for you to know what you know?

Modern: We have a theory of everything.

Ancient: Everything?

Modern: Well, if we need to know more, we use our science.

Ancient: I see … so, therefore, you do not have to ask for advice, nor thank any higher beings for their help. … And I have also noticed that you do not ask permission to use the resources of the Earth.

Modern: No, if the Earth produces something, we are automatically entitled to it.

Ancient: Is there any resource you do not deserve?

Modern: No. We deserve any land, food, water, or air we can conquer and defend. But, to keep it, we have to use our rugged individualism to earn it.

Ancient: What do you mean earn it?

Modern: Well, take farming. To earn a farm, we first

make boundary lines in the dirt, then build fences to keep out animals and sub-species like weeds and rocks. Next, we divert the nearby stream. Then we blockade our plot of land with walls and gates and spray poisons to protect our crops. It takes hard work and rugged determinism to conquer and fend off all of those undeserving others.

Ancient: My, my. Do you want me to tell you how your ancestors did it?

Modern: No, thanks. It doesn’t matter. They knew very little compared to us. We are the crowning achievement of humankind and the most important species. With our science we can figure out how to control just about everything around.

Ancient: While that may be true, though I’m not sure it is, I guess that I would rather live in wonder than live to conquer. And I would rather praise and thank higher powers than believe in a story about control. I have to go home, now. As you moderns say, bye, bye.

…………………..

SHOULD WE REALLY CONTINUE THIS WAY?

…………………..

A Modern Visits the Future

Step into my time transport. We are going to the future. You will get to visit a school. And by luck, they still speak your language, so you can ask some questions. And if you like science, you are in luck again, for today they are discussing the Scientific Method, Version II. You are sitting next to a student in this future class and he opens the conversation with you.

Student: Hi. We are studying the Scientific Method, Version II. Did you ever learn about it in your time?

You: I only know one Scientific Method, so I guess you would call it Version I.

Student: Oh, cool. Remind us what it used to be.

You: Well, I don’t know if I can describe it perfectly, but I think the main thing is that you test if something is true by seeing if you can repeatedly do it. Like gravity, for example. If you repeat an experiment of dropping a ball – anyone, anywhere, anytime – and it always falls, then you conclude that gravity is a true Law.

Student: I see! I think I remember that from history class! Well, Version II – we call it SM2 for short – is similar. Just take out the anyone, anywhere, anytime, then add a few parts.

You: I don’t understand. What has changed? I thought we had a universal truth, good for all time.

Student: Well, get ready for a surprise. Two things changed that your time did not see coming. One is that there was a bias in your thinking; you really were not doing CRITICAL THINKING. The other was that human beings themselves have evolved!

You: Whoa! This is hard to take. Try giving me one thing at a time.

Student: Ok. With our critical thinking we realized that the old scientific method tested the cause of PHYSICAL things by only looking for PHYSICAL causes. We call that circular reasoning. They categorically ruled out SPIRITUAL causes of PHYSICAL things.

You: I never thought of that. Go on.

Student: With our superior science measurement, we found that different people doing the same experiment cause different results. We also measured that the time and place you do things also changes everything. Your scientists probably suspected some of this through the theories of relativity and quantum effects.

You: Wow! To tell the truth, I actually did suspect that a person could change a result. But, what are the new additions to the Scientific Method?

Student: Well, hold your hat! Since your time, human beings have evolved. While we were learning to sharpen our abilities to change experiments in minor ways, we also increased our abilities of perception.

You: Perception of what? And what does that have to do with things that cause scientific laws?

Student: Perception of the SPIRITUAL WORLD. Did you know that there are all kinds of beings that we can now see and work with? They not only tell us secrets about nature; they show us how they have always been causing the physical world to be what it is. We learned that weather is a product of the combined state of the intentions of humans with all the other beings. And as soon as we started experiments of participating in nature, science got really fun! It turns out, the cause of all things are not things. It’s us. Us with all other beings, that is.

You: I think I’m beginning to see the parts you had to add to the Scientific Method. I guess it’s about the INTENTIONS of beings. And I guess you have to include every being from the lowest to the highest to see the cause of science in our world.

Student: Exactly!

You: So, what is this next version, SM2?

Student: It became quite simple. It goes like this: ‘IF IT BE YOUR WILL’.

…………………..

FUTURE SCIENCE MIGHT BECOME GREAT FUN!

…………………..

References

Emerson, R. W., Atkinson, B., & Ebrary, I. (1992). The selected writings of Ralph Waldo Emerson. New York: Modern Library.

…………………..

 

 

Helping Students to Find Their Voice

Helping Students to Find Their Voice

 

 

By ELIE GOLDMAN | Reflection on Post by LORI SOLOVEY

In 2012, I applied to college from Sidwell Friends, a prominent independent school in Washington, DC. Based on answers to a set of clear questions, my college advisor asked me, “What is my content? What are my test scores? What’s my GPA? How many extracurriculars do I do?” Less than my peers on all accounts, I would jest (though not untrue).

Today, college counselors and admissions officers ask students a set of questions with less clear answers; “What is your context? Who are you? What are your stories? How do those stories show your values, skills, and interests? How will your background experiences create value for this college and community? What is your potential?”

The handoff from content to context was catalyzed by a global pandemic in which test-optional admissions policies soared and record levels of applications reached top colleges and universities. With inboxes full of applications from similarly scored (or non-scored) students, admission officers sharpened their focus on differentiators like personal statements and essays. Among these written materials, admissions offices search for what all students have but few feel comfortable using – their voice.

Who are you?

Why do you matter?

For students, knowing, and then showing yourself in an essay is a new challenge. High school tests and college entrance exams present students with a predetermined set of content (questions and correct answers). On the other hand, a personal statement challenges students to craft a 650-word or less response to one of seven prompts. Instead of consuming and responding to created content, in a personal statement students must create the content; content based on their own unique context.

A personal statement invites you to strengthen human skills like communication, critical thinking, and self awareness. These skills empower you to practice self-reflection for self-direction; using knowledge of yourself to more intentionally set goals and pursue passions aligned to your experiences, values, and interests. This empowers you to know your context and show your conscience.

Our voices let us authentically convey who we are. They allow us to translate our context into content for others to consider. In the face of a shifting college admissions environment, lean into its empowering challenge.

Who do you see when you look in the mirror?

How will you voice that to our world?

How to Communicate with Love (Even When You’re Mad)

How to Communicate with Love (Even When You’re Mad)

By MICHELLE BECKER | Greater Good Magazine

A marriage therapist offers a step-by-step guide for a conversation with your partner when emotions are running high.

Our romantic relationships can be a great source of joy and fulfillment in our lives. Yet they can also be the place we most struggle with communicating in a healthy and effective way. It seems the more important the relationship, the greater our potential to fall into reactivity when things seem to be going awry. As a seasoned marriage and family therapist, international compassion teacher, and the developer of the Compassion for Couples program, I’ve had a front row seat to this.

There are a lot of formulas out there for how to communicate well. One I like is from Marshall Rosenberg’s nonviolent communication: “I feel _________ when you _________ and I need _________f.” It’s a really great formula, especially because it helps people to speak from a place of vulnerability.

Here’s the thing, though: Formulas don’t always work. That’s because the words we use are just a small part of what we communicate. Our body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice together communicate much more about how we feel than the words we are using—which means that a healthy approach to communication requires that we come from a grounded and open-hearted place. This often means soothing ourselves before we turn toward another person.

 

More than just words

When there is dissonance between our words and our emotional state, it’s the emotional state that gets communicated. Consider these three scenarios:

  • Scenario one: You wake up happy after a great night’s sleep. You look over and are happy to see your partner. You’re feeling really good about yourself, your partner, and your relationship, and you’re looking forward to the day ahead. You greet your partner with the words, “Good morning.”
  • Scenario two: You wake up to the alarm. You feel terrible. You’ve hardly gotten any sleep, and you have a day ahead of you that you are dreading. To make matters worse, you look over and remember how irritated you are with your partner. You greet your partner with the words, “Good morning.”
  • Scenario three: You wake up feeling good. You look over and see your partner, and you feel really good about them and your relationship. You notice how attracted you are to your partner and you feel like flirting in hopes the morning will get even better. You greet your partner with the words, “Good morning.”

In each scenario, you greeted your partner with the same words. However, what you communicated was very different because of the differing states you were in. In the first scenario, what you communicated was that you were happy to see your partner. In the second scenario, your partner could surely tell you weren’t happy to see them, and in the third you signaled that you were interested in being intimate. All with those simple two words, “Good morning.”

Would you trust an apology from your partner if they angrily shouted, “I’m sorry!” at you? Probably not. We can’t really fake how we feel. And we don’t have to fake anything, actually. What works better is to tend to ourselves and our partners. We need to move out of the state where reactivity runs the show (your body’s threat/defense system with its fight/flight/freeze modes) and into a place where we are able to be responsive (activating the care system with its loving, connected presence).

When we are calmer, we can choose a response that is more likely to have the desired effect. But how do we move from an instinctive, reactive state to one characterized by wisdom and compassion?

Four steps of compassionate communication

In my experience working with couples, the most skillful path to communication actually involves taking in how we and our partner feel and tending to what we need. There are four basic steps to compassionate communication:

1. Mindfulness: We need to disengage from reactivity. We begin by giving ourselves space after noticing we are caught in reactivity. When we notice this, we’re already on the path to better communication.

Choose your favorite mindfulness practice to come into the moment in a way that feels safe. For many, tuning in to the sensation of breathing—especially allowing ourselves to be soothed by the rhythm of the breath—can be helpful. Others find it helpful to turn the attention to where the body is making contact with the floor or chair, or focus our attention on sights or sounds in the environment as a way of coming safely into the moment.

Generally, pausing our thoughts and emotions and coming into the body (or the senses) can help us ground in the present moment and allow our physiology to settle, whereas replaying thoughts and emotions in our head keeps us activated and in a state of reactivity.

For example, say that Joe was 45 minutes late getting home from work and his partner, Kira, was steaming mad. But rather than blast him the second he walks in the door, she can excuse herself for a moment. Alone, she might say to herself, “I know you’re upset and you have every right to be upset. Let’s take care of you now,” then focus on the sensation of breathing for a minute.

2. Self-compassion: We turn our attention to our own state of being. Once we’ve found safety in the moment, we can tend to our emotional needs. What is it that was triggered in us, and what is it that we need? Can we choose to respond to ourselves with wisdom and compassion?

This essay is adapted from Compassion for Couples: Building the Skills of Loving Connection (Guilford Publications, 2023, 276 pages).

Generally, people do know how to be compassionate; we just may not be so good at offering compassion to ourselves. It can help to think about what you would do for a friend who was struggling with the same situation. What would you say to them? You might try saying those things to yourself. Maybe it’s something like, “I hear you. I’ll stay with you. We’ll get through this.” Or maybe it is something else.

You can also explore what you wish someone else would say to you, then try saying these same words to yourself. Taking the time to tend to our own needs helps us feel safe in being open to someone else.

For Kira, she might she ask herself what was underneath her anger. Perhaps she felt unimportant, unloved, and overwhelmed by the demands of being at home with their kids. Pausing for a moment and putting her hand on her heart, she might said to herself, “That is really hard. And I know you’re not alone in feeling this way. All parents feel this way at times. I see you and care about you and I’ll help you find a way to get a break.”

3. Compassion: We turn our attention to the vulnerability of the other person. Once we’ve tended to ourselves, we can open to the vulnerability of the other person with curiosity. We don’t want to lose ourselves, and we also don’t want to lose the experience of the other person. This is our chance to connect with and understand them, or to be understood.

Is it possible that we don’t know the other’s full story or experience? We begin to tend to another by skillfully listening to what they are saying. Then we broaden our observations to take in the person as a whole. When we open to the experience and vulnerability of the other person, we allow our hearts to soften in response to them.

For Kira, if she lets go of the judgment of Joe as uncaring, she might remember the pressure that he’s been under at work, how overwhelmed he has seemed lately, and how much she cares about his well-being.

4. Values: We turn our attention toward choosing our response. Remembering our values, how we want to be in relationships, or our vows to be loving, compassionate, understanding, etc., can help us know how we want to proceed. What would actually be in line with our values?

We choose to respond in a way that has integrity for us. We consider what is truly kind here. (This does not mean becoming a doormat!) When we have a sense of what is wise and compassionate in this situation, we are ready to communicate skillfully.

At this point, Kira might decide to give Joe some space to relax after work, asking that they have a conversation when the kids go to bed and he is more likely to be able to hear what she has to say.

The four C’s of compassionate communication

The above steps to compassionate communication help prepare us to have a conversation, as they did for Kira. However, when we are actually in the conversation, we can often find reactivity arising again. One thing I have found helpful for the couples I work with are the four C’s of compassionate communication. They can help guide us back into a state that is kind, caring, and more likely to feel safe to our partner and enable them to stay with us, listen, and understand.

As you think about speaking with your partner about something that may be challenging, try following the four C’s of compassionate speaking:

  • Centering: awake body: It is helpful to pause here. Take a moment to focus your attention on your breathing (or another safe anchor) and come into the body. Release any unnecessary tension.
  • Curiosity: open mind: Notice what might be under your anger or frustration. Are there vulnerable feelings that need attention? Those may be easier for your partner to hear. Keep the focus on yourself and speak from vulnerability. For example, Kira might speak to Joe about how overwhelmed she felt with the kids and how she feels unloved and unimportant when he is late without calling.
  • Connection: warm heart: Remember the listener is someone you love and are loved by, even when distress arises. It is human to make mistakes. As best you can, speak with an attitude of gentleness. Avoid blame, accusations, and name calling.
  • Compassion: kind action: Is there something you need from the listener? How might you feel calmed, comforted, and reassured? Ask for what you need. For example, Kira could tell Joe that it would help if he called to say he would be late and acknowledged that this would make things harder for her.

While it can be challenging moving from a state of reactivity into a state of responsiveness as a speaker, when you do, you have the best chance of your partner being able to hear and understand you.

Even more challenging than speaking from a state of compassion can be listening from a state of compassion, especially if the speaker is upset about something we’ve done. Here, the four C’s can also be helpful:

  • Centering: awake body: Again, it is helpful to pause when you begin and take a moment to focus your attention on your breathing (or other safe anchor).
  • Curious: open mind: Become a detective, trying to understand what the speaker is communicating. Let go of toxic certainty. Remember it is about them, not you. Listen with an attitude of encouragement. They are letting you come closer and understand them, which is a gift. For example, if Kira is open enough to ask Joe about his experience at work, she might learn that the reason he was late is because supporting the family is important to him. He knew she’d be upset, but he didn’t know what he could say or do to make it better. He does care about her, and he is relieved to know what she needs in these situations.
  • Connected: warm heart: Again, remember the speaker is someone you love and are loved by. Remember it is human to struggle. Perhaps you can remember a time you felt the way they are feeling, too.
  • Compassionate: kind action: Is there anything you can say or do to help calm, comfort, or reassure your partner? For example, “What do you need? How can I help?” Be sure to wait until your partner feels fully heard before you take any action. Often just your loving, connected presence is what’s needed.

Compassionate listening is a skill that can be developed, even if it feels awkward at first. One thing that helps is to approach your conversations with the intention of listening to understand rather than listening to solve the problem. When you listen to understand, your partner is likely to feel important and cared about and in the end may feel understood.

There is so much to explore when it comes to compassionate communication, but at the heart of it is how you show up. I’ve seen really skillful wording fail spectacularly when said from a place of reactivity. I’ve also seen really poor wording beautifully received when said from a place of care and compassion. Taking the time to practice the four C’s can make all the difference when communicating with our partner. Even when we don’t agree, we can come away feeling loved and connected.